|Back To Agenda||Print Page|
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2004
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF THE FEES RELATED TO CASE NO. VRP 161 [REQUESTOR: MARC AND JULIE VAN KLOOSTER, 7264 BERRYHILL DRIVE]
Staff Coordinator: Trayci Nelson, Senior View Restoration Coordinator
Approve the requested fee waiver.
In February 2003, Marc and Julie Van Klooster along with co-applicant's Allen and Victoria Young, submitted a Notice of Intent to File View Restoration Permit No 161 to the View Restoration Staff for processing. In March 2003, a pre-application meeting was held and, despite meaningful discussions on both sides, no agreement was reached and both the applicant's and the foliage owner's agreed to continue to work together to try and reach agreement. In May 2003, both parties notified the City of their interest to move forward to a hearing before the Planning Commission. However, because the revised View Restoration Guidelines were not yet adopted at that time and because several cases were waiting to be heard by the Planning Commission, the item could not be scheduled for hearing sooner than December 9, 2003.
In August 2003, Marc Van Klooster had to undergo unexpected brain surgery. As such Mr. Van Klooster was off work and on disability for several months while he recovered. Prior to the December 9, 2003 hearing before the Planning Commission, Mr. Van Klooster submitted a written request for a possible fee waiver and requested that the public hearing be tabled until such time as the requested fee waiver was decided by the City Council. Thus, the fee waiver request is being made based on a financial hardship (see attached).
Pursuant to Section 17.78.010(B) of the Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code (RPVDC), the City Council may grant a request to waive the fees associated with a development application if it finds that:
The full case-processing fee for this application is $1, 700.00. Since the Van Kloosters are one of two applicants' on this application, they are requesting that only their portion of the total fee, which is $850.00 be waived. The second applicant has already paid their half of the fee. Given the fact that Mr. Van Klooster’s surgery was not expected, leaving him disabled for several months and only able to work a 32-hour work week, Staff believes that the fee may be a financial hardship for the Van Kloosters. As such, Staff believes that this is consistent with the criteria of RPVDC Section 17.86.080 and is sufficient to warrant approval of the requested fee waiver.
Staff believes that Mr. Van Klooster's request for a waiver of his portion of the case-processing fee associated with VRP 161 is warranted, based upon the required findings under RPVDC Section 17.78.010(B). Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council approve the request.
The approval of the requested fee waiver will result in the City bearing one-half the cost associated with the processing of this application.
In addition to Staff’s recommendation, the alternatives available for the City Council’s consideration include:
Joel Rojas, AICP, Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement
Les Evans, City Manager
1. Letter of request from Mr. and Mrs. Van Klooster dated December 8, 2003