| Back To Agenda | Print Page | ||
|
|
|||
|
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE FY 04-05, 05-06 OVERLAY AND SLURRY SEAL PROGRAMS RECOMMENDATION 1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Willdan Associates, Inc. in an amount of $ 50,776 and authorize staff to spend an additional $ 5,078 for a total authorization of $55,854 for the design services for the FY 04-05 and 05-06 Overlay and Slurry Seal Programs. 2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates, Inc. BACKGROUND Professional engineering services are required for the FY 04-05 and 05-06 Overlay and Slurry Seal Programs. The required services include field inventory/pavement analysis, civil design, pavement engineering, and project administration. A Request for Proposal (RFP) was sent to five firms capable of providing the needed services. The RFP requested firms to propose a project approach and schedule which is efficient, effective, and meets the project objectives. The residential roadways that are included in this years project are based upon the Pavement Management Report. Please see attached area maps and a list of the streets included. ANALYSIS On September 30, 2004, the City received proposals from three firms. Proposals followed the two-envelope format; one sealed envelope containing the project approach and technical qualifications, the second envelope with the proposed fee. Each technical proposal was evaluated in accordance with the procedures approved by the City Council on March 4, 1997. The envelope containing the professional qualification of the firm were opened, after this firms were ranked, the envelopes containing proposed fees were opened and reviewed. The project schedule, technical score, and proposed fee for the three firms is summarized below:
With respect to the proposed fees, the variation is primarily due to project approach, efficiencies, and the hourly fees. Although the range in fees between the three proposing firms is significant, staff is confident that the proposal from Willdan Associates Inc. includes all necessary services. Copies of the resumes for key team members for Willdan Associates, Inc., are attached. CONCLUSION After evaluating proposals from the proposing firms capable of providing the required engineering services, Willdan Associates Inc., has emerged as the most qualified. Their technical proposal is ranked higher, their fee is lower, and they propose an appropriately aggressive schedule. In addition, Willdan has successfully provided identical services with many of the same individuals for last year’s Slurry and Overlay Programs. ALTERNATIVES Reject all the proposals and re-do the Request of Proposal process. Staff recommends against this proposal because it will delay the project, and would likely not result in more favorable proposals. FISCAL IMPACT The recommended actions will encumber up to $50,776. The funding sources are the Gas Tax Fund and the Capital Improvement Program Fund. There is adequate funding in the adopted FY 04-05 budget.
|